Hawthorne & Associates provides binding arbitration services by its principal, Robert D. Hawthorne, as a cost-effective method of having an experienced, fair, and impartial attorney and former appellate judge, decide your dispute without going to court. In such matters, Bob serves as the arbitrator under the terms of the parties’ contractual arrangement and any applicable legal framework. Usually, the parties agree that the arbitrator’s decision is binding. So, arbitration resembles having your dispute decided by a judge, but you avoid going to court for a decision. And the arbitrator’s decision is in writing and generally final and binding on the parties. Bob has participated in deciding over 3500 court cases as a fair and impartial judge serving on a panel of three appellate court judges. He has the necessary experience to decide your case in a manner sustainable under the law as an individual arbitrator or on a panel of arbitrators.
Arbitration to suit your needs
Hawthorne & Associates can construct an arbitration platform to fit your existing contractual requirements or, if the parties mutually agree to modify those requirements, we can adjust the process and procedures to fit that separate agreement. Although the basic, traditional arbitration structure may resemble a court trial with an arbitrator assuming the judge’s role, arbitration agreements may contain specific industry-related requirements, or the parties may agree to streamline their arbitration proceeding. We can tailor the arbitration format, procedures, and rules to fit the parties’ agreement and the particular dispute’s requirements.
Why Use H&A’s Arbitration Services?
In addition to Bob’s extensive experience and expertise that forms the basis of our services, arbitration offers the following benefits over having your dispute decided through multiple court proceedings:
Avoid court and juries - less cost, time, formality, and complexity.
Obtain a fair, impartial, binding, and final decision.
Arbitrators are neutral, unbiased, and jointly selected by the parties.
More control over the process, discovery, and procedures.
Often more predictable than court proceedings and decisions.
Resolve the dispute in one proceeding without costly court appeals.
Choose an arbitrator with applicable expertise.
Helps preserve important business and personal relationships.
Public Policy Supports Arbitration as a Convenient and Efficient ADR Procedure
Thirty-three years ago, the State of Colorado joined 34 other states in adopting the Uniform Arbitration Act. Colorado has a long tradition of supporting ADR in general, and arbitration specifically, as a process which promotes settlement of controversies in a manner which avoids the costs of litigation.
In fact, the Colorado Supreme Court’s Rules of Professional Conduct demonstrate the strong public policy supporting arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution methods by requiring attorneys in a litigation matter to advise the client of alternative forms of dispute resolution that might reasonably be used to try to resolve their dispute.
The United States Supreme Court also has recognized that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act is a matter of contract that must be “rigorously enforced” because arbitration offers the prospect of speedy resolution that the parties’contract was meant to secure.